Home Two Hills Blog About Us Emma and Tank Why A Ridgeback? Puppy Purchase Info Choosing A Breeder Lion Dogs Article Willy's Page Emma's Page Wilson's Page 2007 RRCUS NATS Contact Us
|
|
LION
DOGS
By Denise Flaim
Reprinted with
permission of the American Kennel Club
The
February 1954 issue of Scoop magazine – the one with a
well-endowed Mrs. Claus wearing fishnets and a fur-trimmed bustiere on
the cover – contains everything you’d expect in a girlie magazine of its
vintage, from a pictorial of a “make your own bra” contest to an ad for
a “bedside joke book” called Bed-Lam in the Boudoir.
But there’s one article you might not
anticipate, about a curious new breed of dog the editors thought sure to
appeal to their macho readership.
“World’s Toughest Dogs,” reads the two-page
article’s headline. “Rhodesian Ridgebacks are so ferocious they hunt
lions.”
Today, a half-century after the American
Kennel Club officially recognized the Rhodesian Ridgeback in November
1955, that lion-killer stereotype persists, giving rise to
wince-inducing ringside comments about dogs “big enough to bring down a
lion.” Lion baying -- which never required contact with the king of
beasts, only the agility to stay out of the range of its punishing claws
– might have been the Ridgeback’s most publicized job. But the breed had
many less glamorous ones, such as tracking and bringing down game of all
sizes, and watching over home and hearth.
In that respect, our often misunderstood
hounds can commiserate with the scantily clad women in those now brittle
magazine pages: They too are often judged – and misjudged – on their
outward appearance by those who fail to see the complexity beneath.
Indeed, this Renaissance hound frustrates
efforts at pigeonholing. Until the late 1940s, the South African Kennel
Union grouped the Ridgeback with Gun Dogs. Overseas, under the
Federation Cynologique Internationale standard, the Ridgeback today is
considered a scenthound, while the AKC classifies him as a sighthound.
Still more confounding is the template for the first Ridgeback standard,
penned in 1922, much of it cribbed from (of all things) that
endurance-trotting Dalmatian.
Reflecting the breed’s great versatility,
Ridgeback nationals are jam-packed with seemingly endless performance
events, from lure-coursing and agility to endurance trials and
herding-instinct tests.
“We need to be mindful that the Ridgeback is
a working hound,” stresses breeder-judge Barbara Rupert of Oakhurst
Rhodesian Ridgebacks in Fallbrook, California, pointing out that whether
he was asked to course antelope at full tilt, or trot efficiently
alongside his owner’s horse for a day’s trek, or snooze in the shade
while the family’s children played nearby, the Ridgeback required
adaptability, a trait that bedevils purists. “I think we would do our
breed a great injustice by breeding to enhance the dog’s ability to
perform well in one area only,” she says, “rather than breed for the
multi-tasking he was originally designed for.”
And designed the Ridgeback was, a
meticulously crafted canine cocktail that, like a good martini,
maintains a delicate balance between smoothness and strength: a dog that
is strong yet agile, powerful yet economical, courageous yet
intelligent. The native ingredient was the small ridged hunting dog of
the pastoral Khoikhoi people of South Africa. Early accounts conflict
over whether these indigenous jackal-like dogs were valued or ignored.
What we do know is they were crossed – intentionally or not -- with
European purebreds, imparting not just their ability to withstand the
punishing African climate and terrain, but also the peculiar stripe of
backward-growing hair that eventually became the hallmark of the breed.
 
|
While South Africa provided a cradle
for the Ridgeback, it was Rhodesia, now called Zimbabwe, that
ushered in its adolescence. In the late 1870s, Reverend Charles
Helm left two ridged, greyhound-like bitches named Powder and
Lorna with Rhodesian farmer Cornelius van Rooyen, who made a
name for himself by taking rich Europeans on big-game-hunting
expeditions and capturing young animals for foreign zoos. Van
Rooyen interbred the rough-coated bitches with his pack of
lion-hunting dogs, and noted that the ridged progeny excelled at
the work. Their odd dorsal stripe was a natural for what today’s
marketers would call image branding, and in short order van
Rooyen’s “Lion Dogs” became famous and coveted canines.
A relatively young breed, the
Rhodesian Ridgeback was born in a landscape where daily
survival, and not meticulous record-keeping, was the emphasis.
So while no one can say with certainty what breeds went in to
its development, there are some educated guesses. In his book
The Definitive Rhodesian Ridgeback, the late Canadian
breeder-judge David Helgesen theorized that the gene pool
included greyhounds and deerhounds, which contributed speed and
body type; bulldogs, which added substance and biting power, but
also sowed seeds for the drag of the breed, including lack of
height, excess white and soft toplines; pointers, common in late
19th Century Rhodesia, which offered scenting
ability; Irish and Airedale terriers, for the tenacity and pluck
required of a lion hunter, as well as their coat color; and
collies, for slashing and herding ability.
Perhaps there is no more eloquent
description of the Ridgeback’s role in agitating and maneuvering
his dangerous prey than this one, from the seminal book on the
breed, Major Tom Hawley’s The Rhodesian Ridgeback: The
Origin, History and Standard of the Breed:
“The ridgeback, singly or in a pack,
will silently track the lion to its lair, and only on discovery
of its quarry will it give tongue; tantalising, feinting,
darting in and out, just beyond the reach of those fearful
slashing claws, with the nonchalance of a matador,” he writes,
“harassing and wearing it down until that majestic creature,
bewildered by such elusive impudence and weary of trying to
shake off its tenacious nuisance, presents a sitting target of
injured majesty.”
Such dangerous work required a
special character – brave and bold, yet sensible and tactical
enough to know when to retreat. At once imposing and sensitive,
the Ridgeback is undemonstrative with strangers, but meltingly
affectionate to those he loves and trusts. This is one area
where the breed is frequently misunderstood, often by judges who
approach with apprehension.
“There is a wisdom, a knowingness,
and maybe a lack of fear,” says breeder-judge Alicia Hanna of
Kimani Kennels in Chester, N.J., “Maybe that’s why judges
hesitate. Because the dogs are honestly looking at them. In some
breeds, that’s a threat. In ours, it’s a study.”
Indeed, Hanna continues, the biggest
misconception about the Ridgeback is that it has the mind of a
Working dog, when nothing could be further from the truth.
Ill-suited for protection work because he is too intelligent to
be called off, and reserved but never overly suspicious with
those he does not know, “the Ridgeback has all the sensitivities
that a sighthound manifests,” she says. “Our dogs are very
emotional and their body English” – from leaning on their
handlers to backing away from a judge who does not approach them
with confidence – “tells you what they are thinking.”
The breed’s deep intelligence can
also work against it in the ring, adds Diane Jacobsen of Calico
Ridge Rhodesian Ridgebacks in Sebastopol, Calif. “One big
problem with the judging of Ridgebacks is there is too much
emphasis on showmanship,” she says. Quickly bored and prone to
think independently, “Ridgebacks are a union dog – no pay, no
play, and they want double time.”
“Temperaments were much tougher in
the early days than they are today,” remembers breeder-judge D.
Jay Hyman of Rollings Kennels in Mt. Airy, Md., the
longest-standing active Ridgeback breeder in the country.
“Temperaments much better now, and I think overall they’re
probably softer.” |
 |
|
When it comes to genetic issues,
modern breeders still struggle with one of the same problems the
earliest African breeders did: ridgelessness, the only
disqualification in the AKC standard. Mark Neff, the geneticist
at the University of California at Davis who is currently
studying Ridgeback DNA in the hopes of finding a genetic marker
for the ridge, posits that it is likely a simple dominant trait,
which means that only one parent needs to be ridged in order to
pass it on.
A serious health defect thought to be
linked to the presence of the ridge is dermoid sinus, a neural
tube opening on the dorsal midline of the dog that will become
repeatedly infected and abscessed unless removed. In the early
years of the breed, both ridgeless and dermoid puppies were
routinely culled. Today, with changing social attitudes and
advanced surgical techniques for dermoid removal, some breeders
opt to place these puppies in pet homes with strict spay-neuter
contracts, while others continue to cull, following
long-established practice that was exported to this country
along with the very first foundation dogs in the 1950s.
In recent years, hypothyroidism has
become a growing issue in the breed, which is ranked number 9
and 17 in cases of inheritable hypothyroidism documented by the
Orthopedic Foundation for Animals and Michigan State University,
respectively. Other areas of concern include certain cancers
such as mast cell tumors and osteosarcoma.
Hip dysplasia, that bane of many
large-breed dogs, is relatively uncommon in the Ridgeback, with
only 5.6 percent of dogs affected, according to current OFA
statistics. This is due in large part to the diligence of the
earliest American breeders, who began X-raying the hips of
breeding stock long before anyone had ever heard of the acronym
OFA.
Myrna Berger of Rob-Norm Rhodesian
Ridgebacks in Valley Village, Calif., says she sees more
uniformity in type today than when she started breeding 40 years
ago. Then, she says, “fronts were bad, and the rears were
sounder. Today, it’s the reverse. And you need a strong rear on
a Ridgeback because the rear is what propels and pushes them out
of the way.” Other areas constantly needing improvement,
breeders say in unison, are shoulder angulation, and return and
length of the upper arm.
While Ridgeback breeders often focus
their criticisms more on structural qualities, those outside the
breed tend to linger on cosmetics, including excessive white,
which by definition is anything that extends beyond the splashes
of color permissible on the chest and toes.
Traditionally, American
breeder-judges have been relatively forgiving of white, echoing
the admonishments of South Africa’s Major Hawley that white is
likely linked to other positive attributes, was very common on
early dogs, and so should never be eliminated entirely. “We are
unanimous that it should be kept at a minimum,” goes his
oft-quoted advice on white, which walks a fine line between
restraint and permissiveness, “but we must at all costs avoid a
fetish that white is taboo.”
“Judges worry too much about white,
because it’s easier to see white than to find a good front,”
says breeder-judge Barbara Sawyer-Brown of Kwetu Reg. in
Chicago. “In 30 years in the breed, I’ve never judged what I
consider excessive white, nor have I seen it in the ring. I have
seen short white socks. But on an otherwise sound and typey dog,
I wouldn’t fault that or use it as a deciding factor.”
Another area of confusion is coat
color. The first Ridgeback standard adopted in 1926 permitted a
variety of colors, including brindles and sables. Soon after,
likely through happenstance or politics, wheaten was declared
the only acceptable color.
The Ridgeback standard states color
as simply “light to dark wheaten,” yet many judges incorrectly
avoid the lighter-colored dogs in the ring. Wheaten – literally,
the color of wheat – has many shades, as does the crop itself,
including pale flaxen. That show ring cliché – big and red with
a black mask – is a narrow sliver of what the breed can and
should look like. What all shades of wheaten have in common is
warmth, the hint of the sun.


“Because of
so many judges' preference for dark red wheaten Ridgebacks, I
fear that 10 years from now Ridgebacks will only be that dark
red wheaten color,” says Sawyer-Brown, “and gone forever will be
that lovely shade of deadgrass that is rarely, if ever, seen
these days.”
Nose color – specifically, liver
– was one area where early Rhodesian breeders disagreed. Happily
for the gene pool (livernoses are thought to be important for
maintaining the clarity and vibrancy of the coat), brown noses
survived that roll of the historical dice, and today are
considered just as correct as their black-nosed counterparts.
Size is another perennial debate that
has dogged the breed since its earliest days. Indeed, no part of
the standard has seen more seesawing than the suggested maximum
heights for dogs and bitches, which today are 27 inches and 26
inches, respectively, but once went as high as 28 and as low as
26 inches for males.
Acknowledging that the breed has a
range of sizes, just as it does body styles, Hanna stresses that
the key is that mass should never compromise athleticism. “We
need to be a dog that’s easy to transport, easy to maintain, and
is agile in its hunting purpose,” she says. “That’s a
medium-size large dog, but it’s not a giant, and it’s not Dane
or mastiff like.”
After little more than a half-century
in this country, the Ridgeback has come a long way – and at the
same time, he has not.
Bill O’Brien of Redhouse Kennels is
the man whose Ridgebacks were photographed for that long-ago
Scoop story. In 1950, he stepped off the gangplank of the
African Rainbow in Boston Harbor with the first three registered
Rhodesian Ridgebacks in the United States – Tchaika, Caesar and
Zua. He started the first national club, the Rhodesian Ridgeback
Club of America, which in 1957 merged with the present parent
club. Issuing pedigrees for a dollar, he eventually amassed 424
of them, and turned his ledgers over to the AKC to register this
foundation stock and form the basis for AKC recognition.
Today, O’Brien lives in Paradise
Valley, Ariz., light years away from the riverside village of
Redhouse, where he first acquired Ridgebacks to safeguard his
wife Sada while he was away at other African ports on business
as a wool merchant. He still has a Ridgeback, another Tchaika,
and a deep passion for the breed he helped introduce to these
shores. “Those Ridgebacks,” he says simply, “are one great breed
of dog.”
Denise Flaim is the club historian
and AKC Gazette breed columnist for the Rhodesian Ridgeback Club
of the United States.
This article originally appeared in
the August 2005 issue of the AKC Gazette.
|
|